*Larita Kutsarita - n. see THE AUTHOR
*Spoonfuls - n. articles/dispatches/scribbles by Larita Kutsarita
(Background photo by Aiess Alonso)

Monday, August 22, 2011

Pahayag ng Kabataang Artista para sa Tunay na Kalayaan (KARATULA) Nasyunal Pilipinas: Ilang Aral mula sa Kontrobersiya sa “Poleteismo” at eksibisyong Kulô


Art Lesson #1: Ito’y panandang-bato sa ating laban para sa karapatan sa malayang pamamahayag. Sa kabila ng ating nagsasalungat na opinyon para o laban sa instalasyong “Poleteismo” ni Mideo Cruz, nakita natin ang pangangailangang magkaisa upang labanan ang intimidasyon, harasment at censorship. Ang pagsasara ng eksibisyon ay isang mapanganib na halimbawa para sa ating mga institusyon – pagsasara rin ito sa kritikal na pagkilatis at malusog na debate di lamang sa likhang-sining o eksibisyon, kundi maging sa mga isyung panlipunan na ipinahihiwatig at kaakibat ng likha at ng buong kontrobersya.



Art Lesson #2:  Nagsara man ang CCP ay di mapipigilan ang pagbubukas ng makabuluhang talakayan hinggil sa sining, relihiyon, pulitika at lipunan sa iba’t ibang pamamaraan at lagusan. Ang samu’t saring opinyon at suri ay nag-uudyok upang tasahin ang kanya-kanya nating mga pananaw at aktitud, at ang repleksyon nito sa ating lipunan. Bilang mga artista ng bayan, nag-uudyok ang kalagayan upang patuloy na manindigan para karapatan sa artistikong pamamahayag, habang tinatasa at patuloy na hinahasa ang ating mga pananaw at kasanayan sa paglikha ng sining.



Art Lesson #3:  Dapat ipagtanggol ang kalayaan sa pamamahayag gaya ng pagtatanggol dito ng mga nauna sa atin. Ang laban para sa karapatan sa malayang pamamahayag ay pagtanggol  sa sakripisyo ng mga artista ng bayan tulad nina Aurelio Tolentino, Amado V. Hernandez, Lino Brocka at marami pa na nanindigan laban sa marahas na censorship sa sining.  Hindi natin nais na ang paglikha ng sining at malikhaing ekspresyon ay dumapa na lamang sa presyur at intimidasyon, gaya ng nanaig sa mapaniil na proyekto ng mga kolonisador at diktador sa ating kasaysayan.


Art Lesson #4: Ang laban para sa karapatan sa malayang pamamahayag ay hindi lang interes ng mga artista kundi alang-alang din sa kapakanan ng karamihan. Kaakibat nito ang hamon na labanan ang namamayaning kultura ng kamangmangan, takot, korupsyon, at impunity na kinukunsinti at tinutunton ng lipunan sa kasalukuyan, sa kabila ng pangakong “matuwid na daan.” Nakuhang magsalita ni Noynoy upang supilin ang “Poleteismo,” habang kakila-kilabot ang kanyang  pananahimik sa mahahalagang isyu na bumabagabag sa mamamayan.  

Patunay lamang ito na patuloy ang represyon at persekusyon sa sinumang sumalungat sa dominanteng pananaw, hindi lamang sa salita, kundi sa marahas na gawa. Nananatili ang pagpaslang o extrajudicial killings sa mga mamamahayag, aktibista, kabataan, manggagawa, magsasaka, taong-simbahan at iba pa. Nananatili sa likod ng rehas ang daan-daang bilanggong pulitikal, kabilang na ang mga alagad ng sining tulad nina Ericson Acosta, Maricon Montajes at Alan Jasminez.


Art Lesson #5: Nanatiling pribilehiyo ang art education and appreciation para sa iilan. Palasak sa lipunan ang artipisyal na kulturang masa, sensasyonalismo sa midya at mga anyo ng sining na kumukunsinti sa konsumerismo at kamangmangan. Patuloy na pinagkakait ng gubyerno ang abot-kaya at kalidad na edukasyon para sa lahat.  



Hamon sa mga artista ang tumungo sa masa upang bigyang-buhay ang isang bagong kulturang makabayan, syentipiko, at tunay na kumakatawan sa interes at mithiin ng masa. Hamon sa mga artista ang maging mapagpakumbaba at matuto mula sa masa at maging matapat sa paghalaw ng inspirasyon mula sa kanilang buhay, upang likhain ang makabuluhang sining na kapaki-pakinabang sa masa at sa lipunan.  

Hindi lamang art lessons ang mapupulot mula sa kontrobersya – mahahalagang aral ito sa panlipunang relasyon ng kapangyarihan at tunggalian sa kultura, pulitika at ekonomiya. Narinig na natin kung paano sila mangaral at mang-uto. Ang hamon sa atin sa kasalukuyan ay ang buksan ang ating mga kaisipan, upang patuloy na mag-aral at matuto. Maging kritikal, magkaisa at isulong ang isang bagong kultura.

UPHOLD FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION!
NO TO CENSORSHIP AND PERSECUTION!  
END THE CULTURE OF IMPUNITY!
FIGHT FOR A NATIONALIST, SCIENTIFIC AND MASS-ORIENTED CULTURE! 

photo from 
http://blogwatch.tv/2011/08/palayain-ang-sining-on-freedom-of-expression-censorship-and-the-case-of-kulo/

 PALAYAIN ANG SINING!

Thursday, August 18, 2011

The Lola Within a Material(ist) Girl: When Words are Not Enough


I love this top! And I guess it shows. This vintage floral halter top's previous owner is my Mother who also happens to have designed it, herself. I swear, whenever I feel like shopping, I just take a dip into Mama's closet. It's insane. Anyways, I've been thinking a lot about how people stick labels on everything so easily. What is an "immoral" art exhibit that perfectly illustrates the Filipino Catholic religious fanaticism, compared to the heinous crimes against humanity committed by Ferdinand Marcos and his cronies during the Martial Law? And why has his wife, the "Imeldific"--as she is often glamorized by those who easily forget--suddenly earned enough moral authority to deem Mideo Cruz's "Poleteismo" as "blasphemous," having gone as far as remarking that "even the Igorots wear bahag" and questioning freedom entirely? Where was the beauty of freedom in the Marcos regime? What are "dangerous students" throwing paintballs at a landmark structure like, say, the so-called "Peace Arch" whose gates actually keep the people a hundred meters away from the Presidential Palace, another structure that houses the so-called "legacy," one who shamelessly claims to be serving us, his "boss," while he merely nods to the continuous repression of the Hacienda Luisita farmworkers as well as all the other landless and impoverished farmers in the country?; to the constant reductions from the national budget allotted to basic social services such as education?; to the disturbing rise in the number of human rights violations in the name of "fighting terrorism" and whose victims are mostly, in fact, fighters of democratic rights (advocacy journalists, student leaders and activists, cultural workers, national democratic organizers, and the list goes on)?

Words. Labels. They do not hide the stench, the ugly, the evil, and the truth. The senses perceive what is real. And they will guide us in the unending struggle for what is just and what is not, for what is freedom and what is mere pleasure. In fact, even if I go on about the misuse of words, I may very well confirm my premise. And that is, not even I--who might cite the number of Filipinos experiencing involuntary hunger, or tell you of the crises that befall the residents of Barangay Central and other communities that are demolished in the Ayalas' favor, or recount how so damn hard it is to arouse, organize, and mobilize a population of which a huge percentage has been raised by a cynical, middle-class oriented and upper-class dominated society--can possibly express the people's struggle in its absoluteness.

And I cannot think of a far better sentence to end this spoonful. Fuck euphemisms.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

"?" ng Isang Kaibigang Nagsisikap Maging Matatas sa Bikol

kapag natanggap mo itong sulat ko
maaari bang doon mo ito basahin
sa parang.
ilatag mo sa lupa at hayaan mong mag-usisa
ang langit sa iyong likuran.


habang binabasa mo ito
marahil ay kay layo na rin
ng aking narating
malayo sa mga lugar na pinagsamahan natin
ngunit nanatiling sa ‘yo
ang damdamin.


ang mga lukot sa papel ay mga lubak
at lungkot na hatid ng tinatawid
kong mga lambak at bundok
ang mga mantsa at dumi ay kimpal
ng putik sa aking paa at pandama
ang mga punit sa gilid ay hiwa
sa gunita, galos sa balat sa pagkakasabit sa sanga.
sa mga umbok at linyang nagsala-salabat
gagapin mong muli ang nangangapal kong palad.


samantala’y hindi ako nag-aalala
naririto ka sa bawat araw,
ipinadarama ng kalikasan.
tuwing umaga, hinahaplos ko ang iyong buhok
sa hibla ng gintong liwanag sa siwang ng mga
sanga at dahon
sa pagsibol ng bulaklak nasisilayan ko
ang masaya mong larawan
kung paano mong ibunubuka ang iyong bibig
bago mo ito marahang isilid sa ngiti
matapos mong tumawa
sa tanghali, kapag kami’y bumabaybay
nadarama ko sa lupa ang init ng kalsada
at lansangan ng lungsod,
ang tangan mong bandilang kumakaway sa hangin
at kamaong nakasuntok sa langit
ang tapang ng iyong pagsigaw
at ang naipon nating galit.
sa gabi, pagmamasdan ko ang kislap ng iyong mga mata
sa pinakamatingkad na bituin
at muli’t muli akong aawit ng mga paborito nating awitin
habang inaalala
ang ningning ng iyong ganda
at ang kinang ng iyong pisngi.


marahil ay masasanay rin ako
gayunma’y hindi pa rin magbabago;
ikaw ang lakas at kublihan sa bawat engkwentro.
at kung hindi mo mapigilan
ang pagtahak ng luha sa iyong pisngi
at pagpatak nito sa papel,
mas hihigpit ang yakap ng liham sa bukid
upang iluwal nang mas malinaw ang titik
ng pagsibol ng aking pag-ibig.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

The Lola Within a Material(ist) Girl: From "Lao Lao" to "How to Wear the 'Shkirt'"

While "Kabayan" was busy drowning Christopher Lao's car at Mother Ignacia (without informing him, mind you. The nerve!), which would later expose his arrogance in his reaction after he was rescued by concerned "swimmers" nearby, I was stuck at home coercing my brain cells to write something.  Anything.

My months-long literary drought is one of the factors that have greatly affected my recent moods (which would range from "I don't want to live today" to "I feel like killing someone today"), style of work, and overall disposition.  Apparently, this was around 24 hours before I discovered what would be the subject of most online bloggers, tweeters (is that what you call people with Twitter accounts?), trolls, etc. in the next few days.  And all these have entertained me even more than the online hullabaloo triggered by Rebecca Black.  I mean, Black was clueless and can't be blamed entirely for today's pop culture trash.  I can forgive stupidity, but arrogance from a UP graduate owning a car, demanding that everyone tell him it was flooding like Noah's era without asking anybody a single friggin' question was beyond my tolerance.  A friend and I even agreed that PNoy should replace his metaphorical allusions of "Wang wang" with "Lao Lao" which will mean--in addition to PNoy's many versions of said metaphor--"people belonging to a class higher than most, with relatively 'great' achievements as defined by the status quo (a Law degree, laude honors, a position in the University Student Council under the banner promoting multiperspective activism, and whatnot) pointing fingers at everyone but him/herself for a wrong that he/she clearly committed."  There are many Lao Lao's out there, after all, and they deserve to be given a new sort of taxonomy.

Anyways, right before the Lao Lao ideas came in, I resorted to my one guilt trip besides Katy Perry (during her pre-blonde Smurfette and "Firework" days--that godawful song): Fashion.  There are times when I am a bit ashamed of my fondness for clothes, shoes, and accessories--and virtually anything you can wear, really--because I know that forwarding the people's struggle also has to entail the process of assuming a simple lifestyle.  Whenever I would wear red lipstick or anything that's actually nice, fellow activists would ask me "where I was going."  I happen to be not the only one who is subjected to this uncomfortable situation.  Rose, a close friend, also questioned why being "tibak" means having to be constricted to shirts, jeans, and sneakers.  I mean, who wants to explain what she's wearing, right?

I only consider myself a victim, growing up on Vogue back issues (because we were never rich enough to get the latest copies), romancing the 60s jumpsuits Mick Jagger so seduced many teenage girls with, the shade of red lips his longtime love, Jeri Hall, had popularized in the 70s,

and whatever else that I experienced that led me to falling in love for the first time, without any possibility of a broken heart.  Seriously, I developed a love for wearing art at a young age.  I tried to hide it through all those years until college, hugely because Mama was the one who picked and bought my clothes, so I never had any say, except on what other people wore.

When I was five or so, I was made to believe that I was a real fashion designer.  When Papa was away in his lay missionary work, I spent most of my early childhood in the province in the company of my Mother and her three sisters--the "Little Women," I call them.  My aunts' female friends would drop by to gossip and occasionally ask me to draw dresses and suits for them, the renderings of which I happily sprinkled with lots of bows, ruffles, and flare pants (gawd, I still adore those.  I owned ten of them when I was in first year college, until skinnies became the norm).  They took home my sketches and, during their next house calls, would lie to me about getting my designs made or tailored, and actually wearing them to the "office" or "party" of some sort.  Of course, I only believed them up until I realized that most of them did not work in an office (because they were housewives), and cocktail parties were an impossible sight in a little barangay near the public cemetery in the province.  The epiphany was awful.  It felt like when I was eight, waking up one December midnight to go pee-pee, and finding my Mother wrapping presents in the living room with the late night TV show on.  "No wonder, Santa's handwriting looked a lot like Mama's," I thought.  I don't remember if my Mother noticed my presence, but what I do remember was afterwards: I went back to bed like nothing happened, but knew that I was already incapable of an uncontrived child's imagination.

I first learned how to draw when my youngest aunt taught me how to sketch angels standing on clouds with halos over their heads.  As time went by, I thought my angels looked prettier if they wore gold stud earrings and then, later on, gold ballet flats, instead of standing barefoot on otherwise perfectly comfortable fluffy clouds.  My eldest aunt, Tita Manay, and Lola also happened to be seamstresses, although not professionally.  They had these thick fashion magazines that didn't just have advertisements, models smiling from glossy pages, but also step-by-step instructions on "how to sew/make" the photographed garments, complete with accompanying illustrations of the stitches, patterns, and the like.  It was pretty amazing, actually.  Problem was, these magazines were in Chinese, or Korean, or Japanese--I wasn't sure which--so nobody at home really bothered to read the glossies,
although the Little Women would joke that I must have understood the text because back then, I had the smallest eyes in the family.  Such racists.  Up to now, Mama still uses "Chinky" as a term of endearment even if my eyes already grew to their current rounder, bigger size.


Nevertheless, the pictures were a delight.  I remember that the first color I learned spell was "Maroon."  I was enamored by this particular photo of a woman's tailored suit whose color I found both alien and fascinating enough to ask my Mother about.

My Lola was a different story, altogether.  She liked her stuff really old school, as in all of it.  She had this ancient sewing machine that she never replaced even if it was almost unusable.  Her scissors are all black and rusty, her dresser was filled with buttons from lost garments instead of the other way around, her clothes with impossibly old prints of paisely, velvet details, and dark florals.  Whenever I go into Lola's bedroom, I feel like I just got out of a time machine.  I love it!

What I'm trying to say is, it is no small wonder why I put on what I put on.  Growing up surrounded by women who actually give a damn about what they wear has made me this person who simply ogles at Annie Hall's refreshing andogynous look in the late 70s, which Diane Keaton seemed to have acuired up to her golden years (I heard that the actress chose her wardrobe, herself in the 1977 Woody Allen flick),

Left: Diane Keaton in "Annie Hall"; Right: Keaton at present
is completely in love with the original styles of Hollywood icon, Katharine Hepburn, who ushered in the men's trousers to women's closets in the 40s, when it was just plain abominable for girls to wear pants,
fashion designer, Diane von Furstenberg, who "invented" the wrap dress in the 70s,
and current fashion icon and critically acclaimed actor, Chloe Sevigny, who can channel any kind of vintage and gets away with it.
Fashion just offers so many inspirations.  To me, the classics are still the best choices.  Maybe that's why I've been told that I wear too many "Lola clothes."  If that means I don't follow trends, then that's good enough for me.  To be compeletely honest, though, I'm not that free a bird when it comes to wearing stuff.  I have clarified a few rules for myself, such as: Only wear red lipstick when you're going au natural in the rest of your face; Never wear heels when you're not going to a formal event, and on said formal event, take them devils off every now and then.  I ABHOR heels. I think that they're oppressive patriarchal state apparatuses (really!); Do not get too matchy-matchy (i.e. shoe color same as belt color as bag color).  The secret is in the MIXING of colors, however odd they may seem at first (brown and pink, violet and red, etc.); NEVER, ever limit awesome fashion to high-end brands.  Don't be afraid to wear the "unknown's," and go to ukay-ukay stores an hour before they close, because they'll be a lot more receptive to haggling (tried and tested).  Also, when choosing clothes at thrift/secondhand shops, be impossibly picky on details, bring all your garment options around with you all the time for selfish purposes, obviously, and then choose the ones that take your breath away in the end, which means you have to do away with at least two pieces; Hit the "sale" racks first.  And if it's not "to die for," even if it's 50% off, DON'T BUY IT; The best source of apparel, though, is your closet.  Experiment and layer with various pieces.  You may even try the seven-piece, seven-day challenge in which you will wear seven pieces of clothing by mixing any number of them, spread out through the entire week.  This also saves laundry. Just don't include underwear!; Do not fear "doing it yourself." 

I can mention some other rules, but hey, there shouldn't be that many when you actually want to wear art.  "Let a hundred flowers bloom and a thousand schools contend," right, Mao?  If you're an artist, you'll never run out of ideas.  People whose styles I admire in real life are Gilyanne Blancaflor, Daena de Guzman (her handpainted bags are freakin' awesome!), the Dalena sisters, and of course, probably my biggest influence and the fashion icon of mine, whose vast collection of native bead accessories is most enviable, who introduced me to sneakers and slingback flats, and who taught me how to spell "Maroon," my Mother, Carolina Mendizabal.

This is my first ever "The Lola Within a Material(ist) Girl" spoonful, a series of which, I hope, will be writings on what it really means to wear art, on not putting fashion on such a high pedestal (sorry, Ms. Wintour), on anything that's decadent based on how old and nostalgic it is to me ('cause I'm a cool "Lola" like that), and on inventing something that's just plain genius--which is my all-time dream, by the way.

Below is an exciting way to wear the long sleeve shirt as a skirt.  I call it the "shkirt." Not my invention, though, nope.  I made sure to do this at least once in my life.  A mind-boggling yet prodigious look.  It's best to use the boyfriend shirt that's really loose with really long sleeves for better knotting and shaping.  I did the "mini" version, though.  No regrets.  Try it, yourself!
 1) Pick your button-down long sleeve shirt.

2) Position the collar around waist, and button it around a tight enough area so it holds, but skip a button or two at the bottom for an assymetrical hemline.

3) Carefully tie the sleeves in a knot/bow, and...

4) ...VOILA!  Meet.  "The shkirt!"
So, next time anybody asks you what the hell you're wearing, just answer, "What I have been socialized to wear."

"Fashion is only the attempt to realize art in living forms and social 
intercourse." - Sir Francis Bacon

"A woman is closest to being naked when she is well dressed."
- Coco Chanel

“The burden of originality is one that most people don't want to accept. They'd rather sit in front of the TV and let that tell them what they're supposed to like, what they're supposed to buy, and what they're supposed to laugh at."
"I find beautiful in the ugly."
- Marilyn Manson 




















"When in doubt, wear red."
- Bill Blass

"Above all, remember that the most important thing you can take anywhere is not a Gucci bag or French-cut jeans;
it's an open mind."
- Gail Rubin Bereny